

Every automation initiative starts with excitement, intent-based networking, AI-driven decisions, and Python scripts promising speed and resilience. But when someone asks, “Do we know what IPs are in use?” silence often follows. If your IP tracking lives in spreadsheets, you’re not alone, but you are vulnerable. Before writing a single script, teams need an authoritative and current IP source of truth. That’s what IPAM provides and why it’s the essential foundation for all automation.
The risks of operating without trusted IP data are real, and common. In one real-world case, a team deploying a tactical network kit hit showstopping IP conflicts due to outdated records. Without validated IPAM, teams face:
These aren’t just errors; they’re process failures caused by a lack of shared, accurate data.
Saying “we have an IPAM” isn’t enough. Many tools (e.g., SolarWinds, legacy systems) are glorified lists. A modern IPAM must reflect live network conditions, track IP-to-interface mappings, and support validation. Platforms like Forward Networks aren’t IPAM systems themselves, but they help you verify what’s actually happening across the network. Integrating Forward with IPAM platforms like NetBox, Infoblox, or Nautobot creates a feedback loop: IPAM defines intent; Forward validates reality.
To build a reliable automation foundation, here’s a simplified IPAM validation loop:
Don’t over-engineer from day one. Start small; even a Python script can build the foundation. What matters is visibility and sustainability. When your IP data is trusted, your automation can thrive.